[Talk-ca] ACQTECH vs. Valdate vs. OSM User imput for CanVec HD
Sam Vekemans
acrosscanadatrails at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 07:15:43 GMT 2009
Hi, i have an area, which i found interesting.
The York Creek (river) ish..
Anyway it shows the rivers/creeks water bodies that users added in, but then
also we have what is available. which we need to make a 'best guess'. It
shows that in some cases the GPS track is more accurate than what canvec
has.... as it was derived from Vector data. which is not as accurate (i
think)
Watercourse, indefinite - ( Cours d'eau, indéfini ) 1470191
Watercourse, isolated - ( Cours d'eau, isolé ) 1470071
Watercourse, non isolated - ( Cours d'eau, non isolé ) 1470171
Watercourse, unknown - ( Cours d'eau, inconnu ) 1470251
None, isolated - ( Aucun, isolé ) 1470011
None, non isolated - ( Aucun, non isolé ) 1470111
None, unknown - ( Aucun, inconnu ) 1470211
-2 Indefinite Not determined
-1 Unknown Impossible to determine.
0 False Not isolated
1 True Isolated
Hopefully you all can help differentiate these 4 and also the 'none'
features. and tag each.
The chart is available for editing :)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Hydrography_(HD)
So i now (more strongly) disagree that some of the features here should be
merged into the same line.
ONLY the Area/line/points which are Identical needs to be merged.. as the
numbers represent different map features.
So with your permission (Jean Moreau) i would like to fix the
chart appropriately.
And hopefully i can find more eyes on these charts to make it better :)
Also, the big question remains.... would it be smarter to import direct from
GeoBase instead??
Thanks,
Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20090312/124f067b/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list