[Talk-ca] data replacement north east mississauga
Steve Singer
ssinger_pg at sympatico.ca
Mon Dec 12 04:03:42 GMT 2011
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> The wiki will give some guidance on how to clean tainted objects.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/What_is_clean%3F
That page says
---
A node moved by a non-agreeing mapper is tainted.
Clean that node by moving it.
---
That seems to say that if the JOSM license check tool shows a node as orange
then to fix it I just need to move that node a small amount. That doesn't
sound right. I would think that I would need to either move it back to the
nodes original position (to where the node was before the first non-ct
editor touched it) OR place the node somewhere based on on independent
source (bing, canvec, my gps traces,...). I don't see how whatever tools
OSM will use to ensure that database is ODBL clean in April will be able to
tell the difference between those and a casual adjusting of a nodes position
in the course of editing. Isn't deleting/replacing the node from an
independent source the safe thing to do?
I would hate to spend time now 'fixing' now only to find out it three months
that my fixes still left the data as ODBL dirty.
Steve
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list