[Talk-ca] Did I just find a potentially significant bug in JOSM?

Adam Dunn dunnadam at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 03:41:04 GMT 2011


Sam wrote "I think you're getting the exceptions because you've
modified the data, but have not updated the list." This is definitely
an issue I have encountered with Validator. If you run the validator
to check for errors, then delete some nodes or ways yourself, then try
to use validator's auto-fix, it will attempt to modify objects that
you have since deleted. This causes it great confusion and can mess
things up. Validator tends to be good about maintaining internal
consistency, but not external.

I don't do blanket fixes like Dan, I like to drill down a level or two
like Sam, just to make sure that Validator is doing things properly.

If you do open a ticket for this, be sure to let us know about it
(ticket number).

Adam

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Russell P <skiinfobc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thats funny, because I submitted a bug just a few hours ago because the
>> latest (dev) build of Validator + JOSm wouldnt merge duplicate nodes on a
>> canvec boundary.. Anyways, clearly JOSM is a work in progress,
>
> Yes, it is probably worth making a bug report for both of these.
> Please note that josm has it's own trac, not on osm.org.
>
> http://josm.openstreetmap.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>



More information about the Talk-ca mailing list