[Talk-ca] Off-topic: general Canvec issues
Brent Fraser
bfraser at geoanalytic.com
Wed May 18 16:26:34 BST 2011
Daniel,
While this is not directly related to OpenStreetMap, I'm posting this
here since the OSM community seems to be the most active set of public
users of Canvec data. The goal of this post is to improve Canvec (and
therefore hopefully improve OSM).
As a method of testing the latest release of Mapserver
(http://mapserver.org/), I attempted to use Canvec v7 to render a
CanTopo
<http://geogratis.cgdi.gc.ca/geogratis/en/product/search.do?id=A6291EF5-F3FC-A29F-3162-DE4DB194FD38>
style map. See my mapserver post
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2011-May/068731.html>
for more details on my efforts. While the issues I covered on the
Mapserver email list are specific to Mapserver rendering shortcomings,
there were a few other issues related to the Canvec data.
One of the main issues I ran into was the Toponymy (TO) layer
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Toponymy_%28TO%29> is
represented by point geometry preventing me from rendering the mountain
range text (for example) in a curved manner as done in CanTopo. Is
there any possibility of having NRCan change the geometry to
LINESTRING? Or perhaps having a _TO_1580009_1 (linestring) shapefile
for those names representing linear features in addition to the
existing _TO_1580009_0 (point) shapefile?
Some of the other less serious issues (these can be handled by
pre-processing the Canvec data):
Contour layer (FO_1030009_1): no attribute for major/minor contours
preventing bolding of major contours
Stream Layer (HD_1470009_1): major streams broken at tributary
intersections preventing single label for streams
Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20110518/a8ebdbb3/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list