[Talk-ca] Administrative Boundary

[Bégin, Daniel]

Bonjour again!

Available administrative boundary will be included in the next release of Canvec.osm.  From the wiki, here is the tagging values I'm going to use...

Municipal Regional:  boundary=administrative; admin_level=5
Upper municipality:  boundary=administrative; admin_level=6
Municipality:        boundary=administrative; admin_level=8

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Admin_level (Canada)


Municipality admin_level=8 corresponds to gdf order in ISO standard.
 
Municipal Regional Area and Upper Municipality (admin_level=5 and 6) are different from what the ISO standard says (gdf order=6 and 7). Is someone can confirm that admin_level=5 and 6 is really what is expected?

Thanks again

Daniel Bégin 
Centre d'information topographique de Sherbrooke
Topographic Information Center of  Sherbrooke
Ressources Naturelles Canada / Natural Ressources Canada 
2144, rue King Ouest, bureau 010 
Sherbrooke (Québec) J1J 2E8 
(819) 564-5600 ext.242, dbegin at NRCan.gc.ca 




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20120209/86297d4b/attachment.html>