[Talk-ca] Disgardable NHN and NRN tags
Steve Singer
steve at ssinger.info
Mon Jul 30 00:43:37 BST 2012
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Paul Norman wrote:
> This is based on
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-July/008830.html, a
> recent talk-us@ discussion about TIGER tags. Parts of this message are a
> copy/paste from there.
> I think the following can be safely dropped:
>
> geobase:datasetName
> geobase:uuid
I agree. When I started the geobase road imports it predated the ability to
add changeset tags or comments. A lot of my reasoning for having those tags
was to be able to traceback objects to their original Geobase objects so we
could come up with a way of updating OSM with future versions of the Geobase
data. These tags have never (to my knowledge) been used for this and I
doubt they would be very useful for this purpose if anyone tried to do so.
> accuracy:meters
> waterway:type
> sub_sea:type
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list