[Talk-ca] Re : Administrative Boundary

[Bégin, Daniel]

Pierre,

I do not usually ask the same question several times. As It is the first time I see such a difference between an authoritative content and Osm Wiki, I think it worth the trouble to ask twice before processing the entire country!

So, as Paul and you are saying the Osm Wiki classification is OK and I didn't received any comment from other, I'll proceed as the Wiki says.

Best regards,
Daniel

________________________________
From: infosbelas-gps at yahoo.fr [mailto:infosbelas-gps at yahoo.fr]
Sent: March 19, 2012 22:22
To: talk-ca
Subject: [Talk-ca] Re : Administrative Boundary

The wiki values seems consistent for Quebec and I think that we can avoid to restart this discussion again.

Pierre Béland

________________________________
De : "Bégin, Daniel" <Daniel.Begin at RNCan-NRCan.gc.ca>
Envoyé le : Lundi 19 mars 2012 14h34

In Openstreetmap wiki, the admin_level were set to 5,6 and 8 respectively.
...
If it is a documented consensus, I'll keep the values of the wiki. If not, I'll use the the values from GeoBase.

Comments?

Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20120320/c4a1e329/attachment.html>