[Talk-ca] GeoBase tags

[Bruno Remy]

Instead of a filter in an editor, why not a osm-bot doing this job?

Just my two cents...

Bruno Remy
Le 2013-02-25 19:46, "Harald Kliems" <kliems at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Maybe it would make sense to come up with a consensus of which tags
> can be stripped. I know that for the US TIGER data JOSM automatically
> removes the cruft when you edit a way, and we should have this for
> Geobase/Canvec, too.
>  Harald.
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Paul Norman <penorman at mac.com> wrote:
> >> From: Andrew Allison [mailto:andrew.allison at teksavvy.com]
> >> Subject: [Talk-ca] GeoBase tags
> >>
> >> Hello:
> >>
> >>       Are the Geobase attribution tags relevant, should I leave them in
> >> or strip them out?
> >
> > There's no legal reason why you can't remove the attribution=* tags (or
> any tag, for that matter).
> >
> > My practice is to remove them when the source=* tag indicates that the
> source is geobase and I'm editing the way anyways. There may be other
> import cruft that you want to strip out at the same time.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-ca mailing list
> > Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
>
> --
> Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
> Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20130225/0f121d69/attachment.html>