[Talk-ca] Nunavut has a very pour data coverage. Why not Integrate BNDT/CanVec dataset from Department of Natural Resources Canada?
Andrew
andrew.allison at teksavvy.com
Fri Mar 28 16:16:00 UTC 2014
Ivolino:
I'm currently importing canvec data. Is there a specific area that you
are interested in? I would expect all of Nunavut would take me several
years at least :-) Mind you I haven't looked at the data. Even Ellesmere
island I would expect probably about a year.
http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/browse.do?produit=cded&decoupage=250k&map=canada
Andrew
aka
PurpleMustang
CanvecImports
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 13:19 +0000, Pierre Béland wrote:
> What could be good is
>
> 1. the physical layer infos + roads.
> 2. Complete the detail in villages with gps
>
>
>
> Pierre
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> De : Adam Martin <s.adam.martin at gmail.com>
> À : ivo at gmx.com
> Cc : talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> Envoyé le : Vendredi 28 mars 2014 7h14
> Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Nunavut has a very pour data coverage. Why not
> Integrate BNDT/CanVec dataset from Department of Natural Resources
> Canada?
>
>
> The CanVec data comes in layers, so it is definitely possible to
> import only particular sections of the data, such as the roads.
> CanVec makes a good base to work off of. One of the seasoned importers
> can do the work and us regular users can adjust it for the underlying
> satellite data. I'd help with that part myself - always willing to
> lend a hand.
> Adam
> On Mar 27, 2014 11:42 PM, <ivo at gmx.com> wrote:
> Would it be possible to only import the tundra parts? There
> are no wood areas. Or just Ellesmere island? There are just
> lakes and tundra.
>
> Ivolino
>
>
>
> Von: Adam Martin [mailto:s.adam.martin at gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. März 2014 01:28
> An: ivo at gmx.com
> Cc: talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> Betreff: Re: [Talk-ca] Nunavut has a very pour data coverage.
> Why not Integrate BNDT/CanVec dataset from Department of
> Natural Resources Canada?
>
> I can see the point here - better to have something than
> nothing. Still, my tendency would be to opt for a mapping
> project like the ones performed on other areas rather than a
> mass import. Imported data needs to be treated with kid gloves
> as it is easy to end up with faulty information. Wood areas
> tend to come in in a very haphazard way, for example.
> Put out the call - I know there must be several willing to
> help out up there.
> Adam
> Hi all.
>
> Nunavut has a very pour data coverage, almost nothing. Why not
> integrate the BNDT (or NTDB) dataset from Department of
> Natural Resources Canada?
>
> ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/bndt/
>
> I use the map data with the Ibycus Topo Canada v4 map for
> Garmin and they are very good. I think the data are now
> proceed from CanVec should be available for import in OSM.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canvec
>
> I would be very happy to have the topography maps from Nunavut
> but I am afraid I am not experienced enough to import the
> data. Because there is almost nothing so far you can’t do too
> much wrongJ.
>
> Greetings ivolino
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list