[Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada

[Pierre Béland]

+1
J'invite les autres contributeurs canadiens à indiquer leur accord avec le message de Daniel. :)
I invite other canadian OSM contributors to express their agreement with Daniel message. :)
  
Pierre 


      De : Begin Daniel <jfd553 at hotmail.com>
 À : James <james2432 at gmail.com>; Adam Martin <s.adam.martin at gmail.com> 
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
 Envoyé le : mardi 30 août 2016 17h35
 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada
   
#yiv2492822147 #yiv2492822147 -- _filtered #yiv2492822147 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv2492822147 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv2492822147 #yiv2492822147 p.yiv2492822147MsoNormal, #yiv2492822147 li.yiv2492822147MsoNormal, #yiv2492822147 div.yiv2492822147MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv2492822147 a:link, #yiv2492822147 span.yiv2492822147MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2492822147 a:visited, #yiv2492822147 span.yiv2492822147MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2492822147 span.yiv2492822147EmailStyle17 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv2492822147 .yiv2492822147MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv2492822147 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv2492822147 div.yiv2492822147WordSection1 {}#yiv2492822147 I have contacted the user that is about/has deleted some changesets imported from Canvec. I may agree on some of his comments but totally disagree on the method he is using to make his point.     I do not know what the DWG will do about this guy but here is the message I sent him...  Bonjour Nakaner, I understand that you wish the data in OSM being accurate, well-structured and made according to the rules developed by the OSM community. However, I would strongly suggest that you discuss your point with the Canadian community before deleting any changesets.    Canvec imports are running for more than 6 years and the structure of the data was discussed with the Canadian OSM community, including OSMF members, for more than a year. The result is a compromise that used to suit most members. The rules you are mentioning in the comments you leave where not even written at that time.    Most Canadian importers simply keep doing what they used to do years ago. If you consider they should not, have a discussion with the whole Canadian community. You will then be able to make your point, make everyone aware of these rules and understand your concerns.    You will then be able to build a stronger community, not discourage people to contribute because they have made errors...    Daniel    From: James [mailto:james2432 at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August, 2016 09:18
To: Adam Martin
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada    He's even going to revert my work:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41776742 I've forwarded this to the DWG, it's getting rediculous.    On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Adam Martin <s.adam.martin at gmail.com> wrote: That's a pretty harsh thing to deal with. Imports are difficult and the time needed to get them right is not a small investment. To have someone review this work is a valuable service, but I don't think just blanket reverting due to the violation of one rule is the solution, especially in context of the lack of data in some of those areas. The CANVEC stuff will do until surveys or satellite data catches up with those areas.    On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:35 AM, John Marshall <rps333 at gmail.com> wrote: Andrew, I hear you! I have been trying to add data around unmapped Northern Communities around James Bay and Nunavut. But after someone revert some of my work I'm stopping:(    John    
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160830/4defdaf7/attachment-0001.html>