[Talk-ca] Qualiuty of OSM data

[James]

I've read it in the past, I do agree cavec is not 100% accurate, but  in
areas with absolutely nothing, it is better than a blank map: which is
useless.

On Aug 31, 2016 6:02 PM, "dega" <gadelap at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi everybody!
On 2016-08-31 Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> A paper published in the last couple of years (by Anita Graser, maybe?)
> showed that CanVec imports were the largest source of spurious precision
> in the entire OSM database.

If somebody has a link to that document, I would like to get it.

Thanks!

dega

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160831/c50eab6b/attachment.html>