[Talk-ca] Talk-ca Digest, Vol 95, Issue 2

[Stewart C. Russell]

On 2016-01-13 09:27 AM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> 
> I hope OSM is happy to take
> address points!

I hope they (we?) are too.

I suspect ranges suffice for Metrolinx. If you're in a residential area,
you have to consider that addresses are within the uncertainty of a GPS
device. You might as well use ranges, as they (generally) are more
efficient on storage.

cheers,
 Stewart