[Talk-ca] Fort McMurray forest fires

[James]

I've created two other projects as per your suggestion as blocking tiles
for something that is so small in terms of the whole picture doesn't make
sense.

For building outlines:
http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/22

For addresses and residential polygons:
http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/23

For validation(QA):
http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/24

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:45 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I mean how do we decide a tile is mapped?  Normally in HOT its when the
> list of things in the instructions are completed.
>
> "
>
> Also trace - Routes in the region
>
>    -
>
>    Polygons around the residential areas in areas around Fort McMurray
>    -
>
>    Isolated buildings outside urban places
>    -
>
>    Names of missing roads
>    -
>
>    Addresses (via geobase)
>
> Check Addresses are valid with GeoFabrik inspector tool"
> <http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-111.33512&lat=56.71888&zoom=12&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way>
>
> That's quite a lot for a tile, mapping buildings is one process, adding
> addresses is another, checking the addresses is yet another.
>
> Based on HOT experience its best to keep it fairly simple.  So I suggest:
>
> First project tile and map buildings.  This is a fairly simple task that a
> beginner with the JOSM building tool can do fairly well.
>
> Second project tile and add addresses. This is more complex.
>
> Third project tile GeoFabrick inspector tool.  This is even more complex.
>
> You can have more than one set of tiles gridding the area.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On 9 May 2016 at 17:36, James <james2432 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bing imagery is better than mapbox in that region. For addressing do you
>> mean building by building or CanVec interpolation?
>> On May 9, 2016 5:11 PM, "john whelan" <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Should we layer this ie one project to map the buildings, another to add
>>> addresses, the processes are quite different and at the moment its
>>> difficult to say a tile is done for buildings when the address info hasn't
>>> been added and that means mappers going over the same tiles multiple times.
>>> Are we using Mapbox imagery or Bing for this one by the way?
>>>
>>> Thanks John
>>>
>>> On 9 May 2016 at 16:11, Kunce, Dale <dale.kunce at redcross.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If we can get good pre-event imagery and do the building by building
>>>> assessment I don’t think we will need post-event imagery but I can be on
>>>> the lookout for it.
>>>>
>>>> Dale
>>>> —
>>>> Dale Kunce | Senior Geospatial Engineer and GIS Team Lead  |
>>>> International Services |  American Red Cross
>>>> 2025 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
>>>>
>>>> Tel 202.303.4095 | Cell 510.842.7523 | Skype dkunce​
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/9/16, 4:08 PM, "Paul Norman" <penorman at mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >On 5/9/2016 12:43 PM, Kunce, Dale wrote:
>>>> >> Bernie,
>>>> >> I do see that the building footprints are in the esri basemap
>>>> >> unfortunately this doesn’t actually help. The esri basemap data is
>>>> >> just an tiled image and does not provide us with the vector data that
>>>> >> we need to complete our work. I’m happy to take the lead and
>>>> >> coordinate the mapping. The existing Bing imagery is good enough for
>>>> >> our needs for tracing.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Any hope of getting post-event imagery, which will allow us to avoid
>>>> >mapping buildings which no longer exist and shouldn't be in OSM?
>>>> >
>>>> >_______________________________________________
>>>> >Talk-ca mailing list
>>>> >Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>>> >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>>
>


-- 
外に遊びに行こう！
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160509/44bf98e5/attachment.html>