[Talk-ca] help

James james2432 at gmail.com
Sat May 14 09:55:57 UTC 2016


Wrong email...
talk-ca-request at openstreetmap.org

Not talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
On May 14, 2016 12:18 AM, "Matthew Woodall" <m.g.woodall81 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Please unsubscribe me from this mailing list.  Thank you!
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:21 PM, <talk-ca-request at openstreetmap.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Send Talk-ca mailing list submissions to
>>         talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         talk-ca-request at openstreetmap.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         talk-ca-owner at openstreetmap.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Talk-ca digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: Red Cross and Fort McMurray Fires (James)
>>    2. Re: [Talk-us] ImproveOSM data refresh and some updates
>>       (Hans De Kryger)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 21:29:14 -0400
>> From: James <james2432 at gmail.com>
>> To: Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr>
>> Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Red Cross and Fort McMurray Fires
>> Message-ID:
>>         <
>> CANk4qi8twb_neHLNeG5S30my7hfzTHODxHfd0WaO6Nzn6WjxGA at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Ouin quand tu ote ce polygone le damage estimate n'est plus valide. Tout
>> ce
>> que tu vois sur mapnik en brun, est brulee. Donc s.v.p le laisser
>> On May 13, 2016 9:14 PM, "Pierre Béland" <pierzenh at yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>
>> > James,
>> >
>> > je ne vais pas enlever d'infos sans en discuter.
>> >
>> > J'ai Créé une carte uMap où j'ai exclu ce polygone pour plus de
>> visibilité.
>> > voir
>> >
>> http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/fort-mcmurray-fire-most-affected-zones_85549
>> >
>> >
>> > Pierre
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> > *De :* James <james2432 at gmail.com>
>> > *À :* Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr>
>> > *Cc :* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
>> > *Envoyé le :* vendredi 13 mai 2016 20h55
>> > *Objet :* Re: [Talk-ca] Red Cross and Fort McMurray Fires
>> >
>> > s.v.p. ne pas ôter ce way, car il est important aussi
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > oui conserver les polygones a l'intérieur, et enlever way=417984298?
>> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417984298
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Pierre
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> > *De :* James <james2432 at gmail.com>
>> > *À :* Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr>
>> > *Cc :* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
>> > *Envoyé le :* vendredi 13 mai 2016 20h46
>> >
>> > *Objet :* Re: [Talk-ca] Red Cross and Fort McMurray Fires
>> >
>> > Les brownfields à l'intérieur du grand poligone est parce que c'était
>> des
>> > zones residentielles, mais ils vont être reconstruits plus tard, et
>> j'aime
>> > mieux ne pas les supprimées
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > James, pour faciliter la gestion de ces objets, j'ai ajouté la clé
>> > damage:event=2016-05-Fort-McMurray
>> > way=417984298, landuse=brownfield
>> > a l'intérieur de ce polygone on retrouve d'autres landuse=brownfield.
>> >
>> > enlever  way=417984298?
>> >
>> > Pierre
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> > *De :* James <james2432 at gmail.com>
>> > *À :* Dan Joseph <dan.b.joseph at gmail.com>
>> > *Cc :* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
>> > *Envoyé le :* vendredi 13 mai 2016 20h16
>> > *Objet :* Re: [Talk-ca] Red Cross and Fort McMurray Fires
>> >
>> > Hello everyone OsmCanada had a meeting tonight and have traced polygons
>> > estimating the areas damaged and have named them "Fort McMurray Fire
>> Damage
>> > Estimate". They are tagged as brownfield as the buildings have been
>> > destroyed or burnt down. The major areas affected are Thickwood, Beacon
>> > Hill and Abasand. We thought this may help the red cross immensely.
>> >
>> > Big thank you to Rps333 for the help.
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Dan Joseph <dan.b.joseph at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi John,
>> >
>> > Dale is the American Red Cross GIS Team Lead. I'm on his team and have
>> > been deployed to Canada to work in-person with the Canadian Red Cross.
>> In
>> > terms of OSM-CA / Red Cross coordination, I can be considered the point
>> of
>> > contact on the RC side until someone within Canadian Red Cross is ready
>> and
>> > willing to take it on.
>> >
>> > All the best,
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:44 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Have you talked to dale.kunce at redcross.org?
>> >
>> > A coordinated approach might be better.  OSM can use data obtained
>> through
>> > the Gov Canada open data portal and has done in the past as far as I am
>> > aware.
>> >
>> > Thanks John
>> >
>> > On 13 May 2016 at 14:37, Dan Joseph <dan.b.joseph at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi James,
>> >
>> > It looks like some good progress is being made on the tasks.
>> >
>> > Tasks #22 and #23 are focused on mapping different features but it looks
>> > like #24 overlaps in focus. Perhaps that task should be archived until
>> the
>> > other two are completed to avoid confusion among newcomers to the site?
>> >
>> > Task #23 only provides minimal instructions (*Add address data via
>> > GeoBase. Add missing Roads and Street names.*). Would more people feel
>> > comfortable contributing if detailed instructions were included? It
>> seemed
>> > the task is referring to the dataset described here:
>> > http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/geobase/official/nrn_rrn/doc/NRN.pdf
>> > Is the Canada open government licence compatible with OSM?
>> >
>> > Thanks and all the best,
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:21 PM, James <james2432 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > What exactly do you need of me? Prioritize areas to get mapped? We have
>> > tasks for the buildings, addresses and streets(which I think have been
>> > imported via CanVec) and a validation layer
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Dan Joseph <dan.b.joseph at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I'm helping coordinate the Canadian Red Cross' use of GIS in their
>> > activities responding to the Fort McMurray fires. Staff has been very
>> busy
>> > but we're ramping up and exploring options for how to leverage different
>> > tools and data sources to support the Red Cross operations. The focus
>> is on
>> > the evacuees, many of which have dispersed to distant locations around
>> the
>> > country. When residents are allowed to return to the town and
>> longer-term
>> > recovery activities become a priority, I foresee having an excellent OSM
>> > base layer as being a valuable asset. Both for facilitating operational
>> > decisions, and demonstrating the power of the OSM community and easily
>> > accessible geo-data with an open license!
>> >
>> > I would love to connect with those involved in coordinating the current
>> > tasks up on http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/. Is the best channel of
>> > communication through this list or via Skype or some other means?
>> >
>> > All the best,
>> > Dan Joseph
>> >
>> > GIS Officer | International Services | American Red Cross
>> > Skype danielbjoseph  |  Twitter @danbjoseph  |  OSM ID danbjoseph
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-ca mailing list
>> > Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > 外に遊びに行こう!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-ca mailing list
>> > Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > 外に遊びに行こう!
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-ca mailing list
>> > Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > 外に遊びに行こう!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > 外に遊びに行こう!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160513/e8e08048/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 21:36:26 -0700
>> From: Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com>
>> To: Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org>
>> Cc: OSM Talk <talk at openstreetmap.org>, Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
>>         <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>, OSM Talk US <
>> talk-us at openstreetmap.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] ImproveOSM data refresh and some
>>         updates
>> Message-ID:
>>         <
>> CAOcDCsA6XdjbrSN9czL2JyQu95K0qDA-cJ5btHG84-MEem25gA at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Hey Martijn,
>>
>> Was hoping you guys would add zoom 19 to the recent update. Submitted a
>> few
>> months ago on the feedback tool already.
>>
>> *Regards,*
>>
>> *Hans*
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > ImproveOSM has just seen a data refresh that I thought I’d let you know
>> > about. We ran the latest GPS data against OSM data from May 4 and the
>> > results are live on the ImproveOSM web site and JOSM plugins. That said,
>> > don’t hesitate to let me know if you find data you think is incorrect or
>> > have ideas of what could be improved. There is also a feedback tool on
>> > improve-osm.org you can use for that.
>> >
>> > We made some usability improvements to the plugin as well, I wrote about
>> > those on the Improve OSM blog[0]. That post also contains a link to this
>> > 7-question survey about ImproveOSM[1]. If you have a few minutes to
>> > complete it, you are helping us make ImproveOSM a better tool for all of
>> > us.
>> >
>> > Martijn
>> >
>> > [0]
>> >
>> http://blog.improve-osm.org/en/updates-to-improveosm-josm-plugin-for-better-usability/
>> > [1] http://goo.gl/forms/Oa7tFEpNSA The survey does not collect personal
>> > information. However, if you are not comfortable with submitting
>> anything
>> > through Google Forms, here’s a PDF:
>> >
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/q13n0jkk6chirk3/Help%20Improve%20ImproveOSM.pdf?dl=0
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-us mailing list
>> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>> >
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160511/789c2017/attachment.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of Talk-ca Digest, Vol 99, Issue 32
>> ***************************************
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160514/3995f2a0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Talk-ca mailing list