[Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

[Denis Carriere]

I agree with Martjin, those tags should be corrected to *network*=CA:ON

Good catch!

*~~~~~~*
*Denis Carriere*
*GIS Software & Systems Specialist*

*Twitter: @DenisCarriere <https://twitter.com/DenisCarriere/>*
*OSM: DenisCarriere <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DenisCarriere>*
GitHub: DenisCarriere <https://github.com/DenisCarriere>
Email: Carriere.Denis at gmail.com

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted that
> there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual
> hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered
> deviations from that where instead of the colon separator an underscore is
> used, so for example instead of CA:ON we see ca_on, and some variations on
> that.
>
> We are happy to (help) clean that up but didn't want to do so without
> consulting you. Is there some local convention that we are unaware of? Can
> we provide a dump of the affected relation IDs so we can fix them together?
> It's about 400 relations in total, mostly in Ontario.
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Hierarchical_format -
> it has a Canada example!
>
> Martijn van Exel
> http://mvexel.github.io/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20161027/4cad300a/attachment.html>