[Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

[Martijn van Exel]

Looks like these have all been resolved! Thanks all for your help.

Martijn van Exel
http://mvexel.github.io/

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:

> Just ran the overpass query again and we're down to 1421 relations with
> underscore network tags, from 2313 yesterday.
>
> For those interested the query is
>
> area[name=Canada]->.canada;
> relation
>   ["route"="road"]["network"~"..\_.+"](area.canada);
> out;
>
> This does not give you any geometry.
>
> Martijn
>
> Martijn van Exel
> http://mvexel.github.io/
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>
>> I created a spreadsheet to track the relations and fixes. It doesn't lend
>> itself well to a MapRoulette challenge or I would have done that :)
>>
>> Includes handy direct JOSM link!
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O1LGJk6r6gP6NrKYmdAu
>> LKsc0vdNcaTH_k0F_Wjwdio/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Let me know if this is workable.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> Martijn van Exel
>> http://mvexel.github.io/
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Denis Carriere <carriere.denis at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Martjin, those tags should be corrected to *network*=CA:ON
>>>
>>> Good catch!
>>>
>>> *~~~~~~*
>>> *Denis Carriere*
>>> *GIS Software & Systems Specialist*
>>>
>>> *Twitter: @DenisCarriere <https://twitter.com/DenisCarriere/>*
>>> *OSM: DenisCarriere <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DenisCarriere>*
>>> GitHub: DenisCarriere <https://github.com/DenisCarriere>
>>> Email: Carriere.Denis at gmail.com
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted
>>>> that there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual
>>>> hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered
>>>> deviations from that where instead of the colon separator an underscore is
>>>> used, so for example instead of CA:ON we see ca_on, and some variations on
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> We are happy to (help) clean that up but didn't want to do so without
>>>> consulting you. Is there some local convention that we are unaware of? Can
>>>> we provide a dump of the affected relation IDs so we can fix them together?
>>>> It's about 400 relations in total, mostly in Ontario.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Hierarchical_format
>>>> - it has a Canada example!
>>>>
>>>> Martijn van Exel
>>>> http://mvexel.github.io/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20161029/5b304028/attachment.html>