[Talk-ca] Qualiuty of OSM data

Stewart C. Russell scruss at gmail.com
Thu Sep 1 02:12:27 UTC 2016


On 2016-08-31 06:31 PM, Adam Martin wrote:
> I would also like to take a read through that document. Sounds interesting.

It *may* have been this one: “Node location anomaly — Jochen Topf”
<https://blog.jochentopf.com/2015-07-22-node-location-anomaly.html> but
I may be misremembering.

> A giant blank gap
> for Canada would not be very good for the map in general and us
> specifically.

I agree completely. Roads, lakes, powerlines, train lines: all useful.
Millions of land-use polygons that might as well say "Trees (or
something)" are not so useful.

cheers,
 Stewart



More information about the Talk-ca mailing list