[Talk-ca] CanVec Reverts

[Begin Daniel]

Hum.... 
First discussions about importing NRCan data can be find here...
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2008-November/000228.html

They are talking about importing GeoBase - which is exactly the same content that is found in Canvec since Canvec is the merging of GeoBase layers.

If you look at the date (November 2008), the import mailing list even did not exist.

We can go that way but I do not think it the point here. We must talk about deleting data that was imported in good faith, without leaving the community enough time to correct them. 

Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Reichert [mailto:nakaner at gmx.net] 
Sent: Thursday, 1 September, 2016 15:41
To: James
Cc: talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec Reverts

Hi James,

Am 2016-09-01 um 15:04 schrieb James:
> To blatantly toss discussions of the
> past whether to import CanVec or not into OSM and *that was approved*, 
> …

Could you point me to the discussion at the Imports mailing list? (link to the archive of the mailing list)

I am not against importing CanVec data, I am just against importing CanVec data in a bad way.

Best regards

Michael

--
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
ausgenommen)
I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)