[Talk-ca] Fwd: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence compatibility: Open Data Licence for The Regional Municipality of Peel (Version 1.0)

[James]

This is something Kevin Farrugia might be able to help us with

On Sep 8, 2016 6:12 PM, "Stewart Russell" <scruss at gmail.com> wrote:

> I checked on OSM-legal. Would probably work if we had a statement from
> Peel agreeing to inclusion. As is, it's likely not compatible.
>
> Stewart
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Simon Poole" <simon at poole.ch>
> Date: Sep 8, 2016 13:57
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence compatibility: Open Data Licence for
> The Regional Municipality of Peel (Version 1.0)
> To: <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> Cc:
>
> >
> > The additional terms are "a bit of" a problem, however might be
> surmountable if they are willing to give us a statement specifically for
> the inclusion in OSM (along the lines of that they agree that the inclusion
> of the data in OpenStreetMap and distribution on terms of an open and free
> licence fulfils the conditions).
> >
> > All variants of the OGL have a further issue in that you actually have
> to verify that the Licensor has the necessary rights to licence -all- the
> material in their dataset to you on these terms. This might seem like a
> theoretical hurdle invented by me, alas it is not, as some of our UK
> colleagues can testify.
> >
> > Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160908/55eba943/attachment-0001.html>