[Talk-ca] Canvec attributes (roads)

[Pierre Béland]

A faire attention
Dans les zones forestières au nord, au Québec à tout le moins, il y a beaucoup de chemins forestiers temporaires pour la coupe de bois. Ces chemins et ponts ne sont pas entretenus par la suite. 

J'ai beaucoup cartographié des chemins au nord du Québec. A mon avis, seul les chemins principaux doivent être tracés.  Pour les autres, on ne peut se fier aux images satellites pour déterminer le statut des chemins.  Sur les chemins principaux, des camions hors norme font le transport de bois et ont la priorité.  Les routes ne sont en général pas carrossables pour les voitures. Il faut au minimum un pickup + CB pour annoncer sa présence aux camions.
  
Pierre 


      De : James <james2432 at gmail.com>
 À : John Marshall <rps333 at gmail.com> 
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
 Envoyé le : Dimanche 11 Septembre 2016 14h59
 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Canvec attributes (roads)
   
Plus it would help identify which parts and canvec are actually needed vs importing a bunch of forests and hoping for some roads
On Sep 11, 2016 2:48 PM, "John Marshall" <rps333 at gmail.com> wrote:

Great idea Martijn,One of the big problems of OSM in Canada is there are many missing road where there are no local mappers. Canada is very big. Any tools to help map unmapped area of Canada gets a big +1 from me.JohnJohn Marshall
On Sep 9, 2016 17:36, "Martijn van Exel" <m at rtijn.org> wrote:

Hi all,

A few colleagues at Telenav and myself are looking at Canvec 2016. Roads
specifically. I am sure some of you already have done that. Something we
are looking into a workflow that is something like this (simplified):

Canvec 2016 Shapefiles --> Conflation engine (Cygnus [1]) --> Tasking
manager

The output of the conflation would be an OSM XML change file that could
be (selectively) applied in JOSM. It would contain new / changed ways as
well as some new or changed tags. All proposed updates would be verified
manually (through tasking manager.)

What do you think about this idea?

The conflation engine takes OSM PBF as input, so the Canvec shapefiles
would need to be translated (using ogr2osm). That would require an
ogr2osm translation file. I wonder if someone already did this? (I am
using this [2] attribute list as reference.)

[1]https://www.openstreetmap.o rg/user/mvexel/diary/37808
[2]http://ftp.geogratis.gc.ca/ pub/nrcan_rncan/vector/canvec/ doc/CanVec_Catalogue_50K_Trans port/SRDB_EXPL_ESSIM_50K_Trans port-sd-en.html#div-1330009
--
  Martijn van Exel
  m at rtijn.org

______________________________ _________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.or g/listinfo/talk-ca


______________________________ _________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap. org/listinfo/talk-ca



_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160911/86aadf70/attachment-0001.html>