[Talk-ca] Erreurs créées par des non-locaux

[Mihai Iepure]

Hi,



@dega - changeset 41680708 has been reverted with changeset 42314543, with my username (mihaii_telenav). Can you please check the area and update it so it reflects ground truth?



@Pierre - I've reviewed the ways you suggested. Please find my comments in green

*         id=439021577 highway=residential -> this service road (probably private) goes to one house only. not highway=residential. And how useful to add these housing service roads? I see that you changed the source. Looks good.

*         id=439107096 highway=residential -> this look like a farm field track Thanks for changing it to track. Looks good.

*         id=425558698 highway=track -> Changed to residential and added surface=unpaved with changeset 42314695.

*         id=425558694 highway=track -> their are houses on the first segment of the road then highway=residential for this segment ? Splitted the ways and changed to residential with changeset 42314803.

*         id=425558699 highway=track -> their are houses on the first segment of the road then highway=residential for this segment ? Splitted the ways and changed to residential with changeset 42314827.

*         id=425558695 highway=track -> How useful is it to add all these tracks in the fields - for the majority private, for tractors only. Added surface=unpaved with changeset 42314867.

*         id=425501869 highway=residential -> In this remote Labrador area, I see a mine nearby. But I would be surprised that this is a new residential area. This look to me like a wind farm with the spaces at the end of each road branch to install a wind turbine. See for comparison http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/49.2043/-65.6507 Thanks for the updates. Looks good.

*         Rue du Banc-de-Sable (id=435769605) highway=residential source=Bing ->  No Bing or MapBox imagery available. Seems to come from geobase.ca,  trace + Name. Thanks for the updates. Looks good.

*         id=425338059 highway=trac -> We dont know the status of this forestry road. It might have been opened 10-15 years ago to cut wood. But we dont know if this is a permanent road, if culvert and bridges are repaired, what is the exact condition of the road.  Even on the main roads, this is very hasardous to drive in these areas. I agree. How do you think it is best to highlight this kind of situation?



In the future, I would suggest to contact us directly by sending a private message to our OSM username. This way, we can discuss and solve any issues that may appear much quicker.



Mihai



-----Original Message-----

From: Mihai Iepure [mailto:mihai.iepure at telenav.com]

Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:25 AM

To: talk-ca at openstreetmap.org

Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Erreurs créées par des non-locaux



Hi,



@dega - Let me talk with Bianca about that changeset and resolve the issue.

@Pierre - Thanks for checking those ways and for your suggestions. We'll review them and come back with an answer once they're done.



Mihai



-----Original Message-----

From: dega [mailto:gadelap at gmail.com]

Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:25 PM

To: talk-ca at openstreetmap.org

Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Erreurs créées par des non-locaux



Hi Mihai!

You have not acknowledged that you understand why we are not satisfied with the edit done by biancah_telenav.



Would you please ask biancah to "disimprove_osm" and revert changeset 41680708. There are 3 major errors in that changeset.



I have some real (surveyed) improvements to add to the map and I would prefer to add them on solid grounds.



By the way, I recommend to all Canadian mappers to verify all changesets generated by Telenav. In the next few weeks I will verify and survey work done by biancah_telenav and florinbadita_telenav in my area. The Canadian portion of the Map is not a Etch-a-Sketch (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etch_A_Sketch)

for novices.



Among the 700 changesets generated by biancah in the last 6 weeks, I would say that 30% of them are titled "added ways" and 40% are titled with "added lanes number". Not very informative IMHO.



dega



_______________________________________________

Talk-ca mailing list

Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

_______________________________________________

Talk-ca mailing list

Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20160922/9092bb5c/attachment.html>