[Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

[John Marshall]

Paul,

The City add the the building footprints to their open data portal in order
to have it add to OSM.

Also the City of Ottawa uses OSM: http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset
/sledding-hills

Ottawa Hydro which is owned by the City uses OSM. https://hydroottawa
.com/outages/info/outage-centre


Let's move on.


John

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:12 PM, James <james2432 at gmail.com> wrote:

> The city of Ottawa has the same license as the city of Vancouver:
> http://vancouver.ca/your-government/open-data-catalogue.aspx#tab19099
>
> Which seemed to have been deemed compatible, must we revert all vancouver
> imports as well?
>
> You have even stated that OGL-CA is compatible with ODBL in this mail
> archive:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2013-
> December/007685.html
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:58 PM, James <james2432 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Paul your answer is not clear. what is it that the license(ODL i'm
>> guessing?) would impose on top of ODBL?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:52 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So since it is the same license as the Feds which you have a letter of
>>> interpretation saying its fine with the exception of the Ontario Privacy
>>> laws does that mean the fed license is to be written off as well?
>>>
>>> Pity as I like my bus stops and CANVEC highways.
>>>
>>> Cheerio John
>>>
>>> On 24 January 2017 at 20:38, Paul Norman <penorman at mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/21/2017 3:11 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/20/2017 5:33 PM, john whelan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Did you include permission for the bus stops as well? They are from the
>>>> same source and the same licence.  I think I might have included one pitch
>>>> sport soccer.  The pitch was mapped but the sport soccer was I must confess
>>>> taken from their open data source.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I kept it generic, not specifying a particular dataset. That way we'll
>>>> have a final answer one way or the other and won't have to go back to them
>>>> all the time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The initial answer was that the license would impose obligations on top
>>>> of the ODbL, our distribution license. This would make the data
>>>> incompatible.
>>>>
>>>> I have gotten back to them with some additional questions which might
>>>> offer a way forwards and clarify the problems. If I can't get anywhere
>>>> we'll have to decide what to do, but it will probably mean we can write off
>>>> the City of Ottawa as a potential data source.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 外に遊びに行こう！
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 外に遊びに行こう！
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20170125/8e06b140/attachment.html>