[Talk-ca] Municipal boundaries

[Adam Martin]

When in doubt, consult the local legislation if possible. Most of the towns
in my province are afforded land via an Act under the law. It sets out
boundaries which are determined either through coordinates or by describing
the line with reference to local landscape features.

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:08 PM, kevinfarrugia <kevinfarrugia at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Sorry JP, just talking from my experience in Ontario where they generally
> (at least in Southern Ontario) follow legal boundaries.
>
> In the end, whoever does it will need to have knowledge of the area and
> how boundaries work in that province/locality, but boundaries are
> definitely important for geocoding and analysis and would remove the need
> for extremely redundant addr tags that are used for cities.
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "J.P. Kirby" <webmaster at the506.com>
> Date: 2017-03-07 1:21 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: James <james2432 at gmail.com>
> Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Municipal boundaries
>
> And even then, not all CSDs are municipalities. In Nova Scotia for
> instance they have "county subdivisions" which have no legal standing at
> all and are just StatsCan creations.
>
> I'd suggest boundaries of actual municipalities are worthy of being added
> into OSM, but not all CSDs fit that bill.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 7, 2017, at 2:10 PM, James <james2432 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> CSDs are suppose to represent city/town limits (observable as usually
> there's a sign that says Welcome to X or Sorry to see you leave X), but
> they have been rounded off to look nice and may not reflect what it is in
> reality
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Stewart C. Russell <scruss at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-03-07 10:36 AM, Bjenk Ellefsen wrote:
>> >
>> > … Any more thoughts?
>>
>> If you're planning to import/add abstract statistical boundaries, rather
>> than those defined by municipal boundaries, then I'd suggest that they
>> don't belong in OSM.
>>
>>  “Contributions to OpenStreetmap should be:
>>    1. Truthful - means that you cannot contribute something you have
>>     invented.
>>    2. Legal - means that you don't copy copyrighted data without
>>     permission.
>>    3. Verifiable - means that others can go there and see for
>>     themselves if your data is correct.
>>    4. Relevant - means that you have to use tags that make clear to
>>     others how to re-use the data
>>
>>   When in doubt, also consider the "on the ground rule": map the world
>>   as it can be observed by someone physically there.”
>>
>>  — How We Map <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map>
>>
>> Unless CSDs are physically observable, they are too abstract for OSM.
>>
>>  Stewart
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20170307/70ec4026/attachment-0001.html>