[Talk-ca] Using City of Vancouver Open Licensed Data?

James james2432 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 3 12:33:33 UTC 2017

I'm not sure if Paul has imported data for Vancouver before or not. But
before you import, you need to document on the wiki.
would be a good place to start looking what people have done in the past

On Oct 2, 2017 10:57 PM, "keith" <keithistan at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Canada list,
> I am interested in using some of the data provided by the City of
> Vancouver under the "Open Government Licence – Vancouver" (
> http://vancouver.ca/your-government/open-data-catalogue.aspx#tab19099).
> According to the OSM wiki this is compatible with OSM's licence (
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Vancouver), is this
> accurate?
> I want to do small imports of building traces, manually checking the
> imagery against the Imagery. I guess this should still be considered to
> finish off the section of Vancouver that does not have the buildings
> traced. The quality of the data from the City of Vancouver is OK, not
> amazing, in fact slightly lower than the average for Vancouver building
> traces, but not outside the range. It would be trivial to improve the
> traces to be better than average, and I would do so for what I import. It's
> for a relatively small area, about 2km by 4.5km, and I would be doing lots
> of manual fixes and inspection. So many that I'm not really sure that it's
> exactly an import.
> If the building traces goes smoothly, and has general acceptance, I might
> use other data from the listed datasets.
> What do the folks on this list say? Am I good to go ahead with this?
> Thanks for any input.
> Keith
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20171003/0c159f36/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-ca mailing list