[Talk-ca] Local groups? Digest, Vol 130, Issue 4

keith hartley keith.a.hartley at gmail.com
Wed Dec 12 00:26:23 UTC 2018


I think Canada has some great invested mappers, and resources but we're
pretty far apart! We don't quite have the level of org like the US or
europe has.
As long as we can get the municipality on board with the proper license (IE
OGL 2.0) we can take them on - IE one person did Regina in a matter of days
once it was cleared.



On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:21 PM john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds like we have perhaps four or five groups covering 3,700
> municpalities so the best approach will be to list the areas available and
> to request basic tagging say building type and the number of levels from
> where ever we can get them.  You never know mapillary may have some
> coverage.
>
> I'm thinking along the lines of Stat Can crowd sourcing efforts for
> building outlines and possibly some sort of a hook involvement although
> that would require some sort of validation as per the organised mapping
> guidelines.
>
> Thanks John
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 3:38 PM keith hartley <keith.a.hartley at gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> As far as I can tell there's a few of us in Manitoba. I have a small
>> group that gets together every month to map out something! I know a few
>> mappers in sask too, but nothing organized.
>> Keith
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:01 AM <talk-ca-request at openstreetmap.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Send Talk-ca mailing list submissions to
>>>         talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>         talk-ca-request at openstreetmap.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>         talk-ca-owner at openstreetmap.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Talk-ca digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>    1. hebdoOSM Nº 437 2018-11-27-2018-12-03 (theweekly.osm at gmail.com)
>>>    2. Local groups? (john whelan)
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 05:54:13 -0800 (PST)
>>> From: theweekly.osm at gmail.com
>>> To: talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>> Subject: [Talk-ca] hebdoOSM Nº 437 2018-11-27-2018-12-03
>>> Message-ID: <5c0e7005.1c69fb81.9fbe6.1d69 at mx.google.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 437 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de
>>> paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur :
>>>
>>> http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/11081/
>>>
>>> Bonne lecture !
>>>
>>> hebdoOSM ?
>>> Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages
>>> Où :
>>> https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:33:19 -0500
>>> From: john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>
>>> To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
>>> Subject: [Talk-ca] Local groups?
>>> Message-ID:
>>>         <CAJ-Ex1HXHjcMiFuBvykjcsdrS8L_ayQ++bG_HWyhvK=+
>>> it9gwg at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> Microsoft have released building outline data for the US.  I have heard
>>> rumours that they will be releasing a few for Canada.
>>>
>>> I'm not proposing to import them at this point but these days importing
>>> is
>>> its own speciality and it needs a mixture of technical skills and boots
>>> on
>>> the ground or at least coverage by Mapillary.
>>>
>>> It would make sense to import them for areas that have local mappers
>>> first
>>> so they could be enriched with building type etc.
>>>
>>> I know there are local mappers in Ottawa, Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal
>>> but is there a list somewhere of the local groups in Canada?
>>>
>>> Just looking at the number of edits in an area isn't as helpful as I
>>> thought it might be.  Andrew seems to be mapping Canada single handedly.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Cheerio John
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20181210/7b6fbb37/attachment-0001.html
>>> >
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> End of Talk-ca Digest, Vol 130, Issue 4
>>> ***************************************
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20181211/9867e8b7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Talk-ca mailing list