[Talk-ca] Talk-ca Digest, Vol 129, Issue 15

[keith hartley]

I saw it was a great job. But you're correct, I have no documentation on
how they did it. Licence process, wiki ( I feel Steve already yelling at
his computer)

On Nov 5, 2018 9:24 AM, "john whelan" <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:

>Someone already did Regina!

and that is an issue and why we need to get this lot formalised quickly
before someone starts talking about imports being done without the correct
license.

Cheerio John

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 10:15, keith hartley <keith.a.hartley at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Someone already did Regina!
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 9:06 AM James <james2432 at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Saskatchewan has Regina data. That's it.
>>
>> It's totally dependent on cities contributing to the open data effort
>>
>> On Mon., Nov. 5, 2018, 9:21 a.m. keith hartley <keith.a.hartley at gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I'd love to do more imports - I have a group here that we get together
>>> to do mapping as well as know some locals. Of course we'd add a wiki to the
>>> MB page to show the project ect.  From what I can tell there's no stats can
>>> data for manitoba or sask though!
>>> Keith
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20181105/b18d47d0/attachment-0001.html>