[Talk-ca] 2020 building import wiki comment by Nate Wessel
Pierre Béland
pierzenh at yahoo.fr
Fri Jan 18 23:54:30 UTC 2019
John,
Il y a local et local. Compte-tenu des différences culturelles Québec vs Canada en général et que les contributeurs du Québec ne fréquentent pratiquement pas cette liste, vous ne devriez pas prendre pour acquis que vous représentez cette communauté et pouvez démarrer des projets en son nom.
Pierre
Le vendredi 18 janvier 2019 13 h 11 min 37 s HNE, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> a écrit :
I know of no other way to contact him but he made an interesting comment that the project is on hold in the wiki pending review.
Would he care to comment on who is supposed to be reviewing the project?
My understanding is that the import was raised in talk-ca before it commenced for comment and these were generally favourable. I took that as the local mappers to Canada had been consulted and they are the "local mappers" authority in this case.
I understand he has concerns about local mappers making decisions but in Canada we have been importing similar data through CANVEC for some time. CANVEC data comes from a number of sources including municipal data.
Is he suggesting that each of the 3,700 municipalities in Canada should form a group of local mappers who can make individual decisions on whether their municipal data should be imported and we should end up with 3,700 import plans?
Thanks John
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20190118/6c098928/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list