[Talk-ca] Road name edits in Canada
Jarek Piórkowski
jarek at piorkowski.ca
Sun May 1 19:20:54 UTC 2022
Hello Andy,
The mapper has been active in my neighbourhood and I am sad to report
that their edits at least in the Toronto area must be considered
suspect. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120101768 they
added a bubble tea shop which was not yet open at the time, and in a
wrong location. The shop opened yesterday at 1660 Queen St W; the
editor added it 8 days ago at 1598 Queen St W, supposedly replacing a
long-empty storefront (which in fact remains empty). I would have to
suspect that the fact that the shop is currently incorrectly listed in
Google Maps at 1600 Queen St W is not a coincidence.
--Jarek
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 16:53, Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello talk-ca people,
>
> Andy from the Data Working Group here.
>
> A new prolific mapper has recently popped up, adding road names in
> Canada and elsewhere. It has been suggested to the DWG that many of the
> names used were just copied from sources that aren't licence-compatible
> with OSM, such as Google Maps. Some responses to questions about map
> sources have been somewhat evasive (see e.g.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119735027 ) but they now claim
> to be using sources such as:
>
> "City of Winnipeg Open Data Portal - Contains information licensed under
> the Open Government Licence – Winnipeg."
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/734204653
>
> and
>
> "Statistics Canada Road Network File (RNF)"
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507685150
>
> (see https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/119761959 for more)
>
> Do these sources check out as reasonable, and licence-compatible with
> OSM? Also (and actually more important) are the latest edits by this
> user backed up by those sources?
>
> Normally of course OSM mappers have considerable freedom to map as they
> wish - we take a lot on trust, and don't check that every edit that was
> allegedly derived from a compatible imagery source actually was and
> wasn't from a non-compatible source instead. Unfortunately, in the case
> of this mapper (see previous interactions at e.g.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/PopeyePopcord/blocks and
> https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/119735027 ) I think we need to have
> a soupçon of skepticism.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list