[Talk-de] Broken turn relations

Peter Wendorff wendorff at uni-paderborn.de
Do Jun 21 09:27:57 UTC 2012

For me nodes, ways and areas sound reasonable for slipways.
A slipway is similar to a street => in osm a way.
It may be a very small feature and somebody may only know the estimated 
location => in osm a node
It may be of very different width up to a wide area like => in osm a 
polygon/closed way.

Small slipways often are some kind of street extending to the water, so 
a way should fit perfectly.


Am 21.06.2012 10:38, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> 2012/6/21 Peter Wendorff<wendorff at uni-paderborn.de>:
>> According to the wiki slipways are correct as a non-closed way, so this is
>> an error of the Navit converter.
> this is not completely clear. The wiki page for the feature used to
> define it for nodes only, then someone changed this to linear ways
> only: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipway&action=historysubmit&diff=595262&oldid=510283
> someone else changed it back months later:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipway&action=historysubmit&diff=711100&oldid=689606
> and then ways were added again:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipway&action=historysubmit&diff=727279&oldid=711100
> The map-features still list only nodes as valid elements for slipways:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure?uselang=en-US
> Taginfo lists 7857 nodes and 1607 ways.
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=slipway
> Shall we add ways for this feature in the map features compilation?
> cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-de mailing list
> Talk-de at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste Talk-de