[Talk-ec] Removal of suspected copyrighted data

Temporalista temporalista at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 08:47:38 GMT 2011


Dear Frederik

Thanks for your mail.

In fact, we've been discussing this issue in the ecuadorian OSM community.

Please, would you mind to give us some advice on how to proceed with this
kind of CR violations. So far what we did is:

1.- Look for clues that may indicate that the data comes from a different
source than surveying (large edits, non-standard tags, etc.)

2.- Attempt to contact the user and set a deadline to proof his/her data is
compatible with the OSM licence.

3.- Warn the community to not edit the data in question until the issue is
closed.

4.- Seek for advice/support from OSM groups to delete data / revert changes.

Thanks for taking action, and don't worry: we'll keep good mapping.

Abrazos

daniel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Orellana V.
Lab. of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing
Wageningen University, Wageningen
The Netherlands
http://www.grs.wur.nl/UK

Room C216, Gaia, Building 101, Bode 37
Tel.: +31 (0) 317 482092



On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 01:30, Frederik Ramm <frederik en remote.org> wrote:

> Dear contributors in Ecuador,
>
>   I am writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. We deal with
> copyright violations.
>
> Earlier this month we have been made aware of striking similarities between
> OSM data in a number of cities (Ambato, Santo Domingo, Esmeraldas, Riobamba)
> and commercial data from a map provider called Location World.
>
> We have analysed these similarities and concluded that someone has uploaded
> copyrighted data from that source, on a large scale (roughly 10,000 ways and
> 50,000 nodes) to OSM in September 2010.
>
> The uploader has not responded to our attempts at contacting him.
>
> As I'm sure you know, we have to take these matters seriously. OSM can only
> thrive if stick to truly free data; we cannot import data from copyrighted
> sources.
>
> Therefore we are removing all the infringing content. Sadly, in some places
> others have edited the data after it had been uploaded; these edits are now
> also lost.
>
> The changesets in which the removal is executed are:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7036124
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7034729
>
> I am sorry to have to bring you this message; we're all mappers here at the
> DWG and it hurts us as much as it hurts you to see data vanish from the map.
> But we have to stick to what's legal. I hope that this does not prove to be
> too much of a setback for the industrious OSM community in Ecuador.
>
> Keep up the good work!
>
> Best wishes
> Frederik Ramm
> for the Data Working Group (data en osmfoundation.org)
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik en remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ec mailing list
> Talk-ec en openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ec
>
------------ pr?xima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ec/attachments/20110121/133afa0f/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-ec mailing list