[Talk-es] highway = pedestrian OR highway = footway & bicycle = yes ??????

Jorge Juan jjchico en gmail.com
Jue Feb 10 11:19:32 GMT 2011


Hi!

I asked about the same thing a few days ago [1]. In the wiki,
pedestrian [2] is mainly for regular streets where traffic is not
allowed. Most of these streets are commercial streets, but in my
opinion it should not be necessary to have shops to be "pedestrian".
Footways is for "designated footpaths" [3]. I think the two
definitions quite overlap in some cases. My current criteria is:

- "pedestrian": normally wide street, normally has a name, main access
to buildings and/or houses and/or commercial places.
- "footway": normally narrow paths, normally does not have a name,
normally not a main access: maybe a shortcut.

In your example I would use "pedestrian" since it is a regular
residential road, has a name, etc. In fact it seems that the same
street allows cars at some points, so it is the "pedestrian" part of a
regular residential road.

"bicycle=yes" depends may depend on the country's regulations. If you
know for sure that bicycles

I hope this helps you.

[1] http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/2750/pedestrian-vs-footway
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
[3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway

El día 10 de febrero de 2011 10:19, Jan Tappenbeck
<osm en tappenbeck.net> escribió:
>
>
>  hello !
>
> transate by google:
>
> i calles mapa en malaga por bing-ortofoto.
>
> hay muchas áreas para las personas alrededor de los edificios - ver [1] con
> bing en el fondo.
>
> Mapa alguien esta carretera, como  highway = pedestrian [2] un yo preferiría
> highway = footway & bicycle = yes [3].
>
> ¿Cuál es su opinión??
>
> se refiere a Jan :-)
>
>
>
> i map streets in malaga by bing-orthophoto.
>
> there are many areas for persons around the buildings - look [1] with bing
> in the background.
>
> someone map this like highway = pedestrian [2] an i would prefer highway =
> footway & bicycle = yes [3].
>
> what is your mind ??
>
> regards Jan :-)
>
>
>
> [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=36.709922&lon=-4.442607&zoom=19
>
> [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/88500745
>
> [3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/98983381
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-es mailing list
> Talk-es en openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
>



-- 
Jorge Juan



More information about the Talk-es mailing list