[Talk-gb-london] Conflating TfL CID cycle data to OSM

[David Davis]

I'm a bit surprised to read that it proposes to discard signage.
Obviously, yes, *every* traffic sign would be way over the top, but are
route signs not useful?
If these have a 'guidepost' and a 'destination' tag, it's possible to make
destination relations that can be use by route planning apps. (Not that I
have a clue how to actually do the latter, but.. ;)
I've tagged quite a few of these in recent months.

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 4:29 PM Robert Skedgell <rob at hubris.org.uk> wrote:

> On 13/05/2022 16:10, Whittaker, Ed via Talk-gb-london wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Pleased to let you know that we have been commissioned by TfL to
> continue the good work of cyclestreets in completing the migration of the
> CID to OSM. In the first instance, we've updated the associated wiki to
> give more detail about this renewed effort:
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TfL_Cycling_Infrastructure_Database
> >
> > This is just a small introduction - we'll be in touch with updates on
> the conflation approach. We're very grateful to receive your questions and
> comments!
> >
> > Lu (GHD), Ed (Sweco) and Aidan (GHD)
> >
> >
> > Ed Whittaker
>
> Hi,
>
> It's great to see something finally being done with the TfLCID data on a
> larger scale.
>
> I've been manually matching and adding some TfLCID assets within Newham
> as I edit other highway features. So far I've been using the key
> ref:GB:tflcid for TfL's asset ref., but I'm happy to change those if you
> were planning to use another key.
>
> --
> Robert Skedgell (rskedgell)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-gb-london mailing list
> Talk-gb-london at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-london/attachments/20220513/a29bcfe4/attachment.htm>