[Talk-gb-westmidlands] NaPTAN merge tool

[Brian Prangle]

I agree that this makes sense  - the only change I would want is for the
green (i.e completed) status to also require the presence of shelter=yes/no
i.e presence of shelter key regardless of value

2009/4/3 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) <ajrlists at googlemail.com>

> Christoph,
>
> http://www.mappa-mercia.org/cgi-bin/naptanmerger.wsgi/ Looking good :-)
>
> A few comments on how this might work. Suggestions only for you to think
> about and to elicit comments from others.
>
> Green would show a stop that's got merged data, i.e. it's a done deal and
> no
> further work is required. To flag this as green you would check for:
>
> highway=bus_stop
> The presence of the naptan:atcoCode key
> naptan:unverified=yes tag is no longer present
> route_ref tag is present
>
> Orange would be one step down where one or more of the above are false
> except for the following specific cases:
>
> Yellow (or some other colour) would be a NaPTAN imported node which
> contains:
> no highway=bus_stop tag
> The presence of the naptan:atcoCode key
> naptan:unverified=yes tag is still present
>
> Blue (or some other colour) would be a node which has highway=bus_stop but
> no naptan tags indicating that its OSM suryeyed data alone.
>
> Red, to denote a naptan node that has no physical presence on the ground
> and
> no known use as a bus stop. This would be a node containing:
>
> no highway=bus_stop tag
> naptan tags present
> physically_present=no tag present
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
> Talk-gb-westmidlands at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/attachments/20090403/ff4f0df0/attachment.html>