[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Brumtunnels

[Andy Robinson]

Brian,

 

The idea of a block at each end is a good one, because that's exactly what's
there for the closure. I'd be happy to run with that.

 

Cheers

Andy

 

From: Brian Prangle [mailto:bprangle at gmail.com] 
Sent: 25 April 2013 10:04
To: Andy Robinson
Cc: talk-gb-westmidlands
Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Brumtunnels

 

Hi Andy

 

Presumably this is for routing engines?  I'm torn as to whether this is the
right approach. We didn't do this for the Midlands Metro when it was shut
for construction upgrading work for 2 weeks. The tunnel work is  not really
construction it's more maintenance of an existing structure. Typically we
use the tag for new roads under construction. We could put a barrier=block
on each end of the tunnel and change the name of the way by adding (closed
for maintenance- reopens on xxx). I'm just worried that we get an edit war
with well-meaning mappers changing it back, even if it's commented with a
note.  But if the consensus is to use highway=construction then that's fine
with me

 

Regards

 

Brian

 

On 24 April 2013 09:46, Andy Robinson <ajrlists at gmail.com> wrote:

Suggest we change tags to highway=construction during each period when the
various city centre tunnels are closed by BCC/Amey for refurbishment.

http://www.amey.co.uk/brumtunnels.aspx

Cheers
Andy


_______________________________________________
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6271 - Release Date: 04/24/13

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/attachments/20130425/78f23b54/attachment.html>