[Talk-GB] NCN refs - consistency
david at frankieandshadow.com
Tue Jul 10 23:18:03 BST 2007
Sustrans, who developed the network, uses 'NCN' as the abbreviation. I
would prefer NCN25, though I appreciate it is a bit verbose. But if they
can be rendered in red/blue boxes as per the road signs, then I think
that would be a reasonable alternative. Mind you, the rendering can do
that even if the tag says NCN or N or whatever, by simply dropping the
letters if it knows it is part of NCN
On 10/07/2007 22:06, Andy Allan wrote:
> Hi all,
> There's currently little national consistency with the ncn_ref values.
> Variations are:
> 4 (digits only)
> N4 (1 char prefix)
> NR4 (2 char prefix)
> NCN 4 (3 char prefix, and space)
> NCN25 (3 char prefix, no space)
> R79 (regional, 1 char prefix)
> RR47 (regional, 2 char prefix)
> proposed NR41 (free text)
>>From looking at the coverage, the first and second are quite popular,
> with the 1 char regional routes prevalent, especially in Kent. I'd
> like to get some consistency, since it looks a mess on my renderings!
> Personally, I prefer the digits only, but I'm not 'into' the national
> cycle network much, so I'm interested to see if there is a convention
> established elsewhere in print. The signposts I've seen have only the
> route number. My personal feeling is that the N prefix is redundant.
> I've started tagging London Cycle Network with an lcn_ref tag. Would
> we be better off doing similar for the Regional Routes (rcn_ref)? I'd
> like to render them differently (red for ncn, blue for lcn is my
> current theme) and it's just easier for me to do so based on tags
> rather than values.
> I'd appreciate anyone's thoughts.
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-GB