[Talk-GB] London progress and unnamed roads

[SteveC]

Almost there... possible to tone down the other stuff more?

On 31 Jan 2008, at 18:04, Dave Stubbs wrote:

> On Jan 31, 2008 4:03 PM, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 31 Jan 2008, at 16:02, Dave Stubbs wrote:
>>
>>> I was aiming more for a map of what's really there, rather than a  
>>> map
>>> of what's not there.
>>> The tracing people haven't actually managed to do everywhere yet,  
>>> so I
>>> thought it gave a slightly better impression.
>>> There's also the false positives, ie: residential streets that
>>> actually don't have a name... in a highlight mode these become more
>>> obvious than you really want them. In dehighlight mode they just
>>> vanish, and you don't notice.
>>>
>>> I did try all residential streets with no name bright pink, but it  
>>> was
>>> kind of scary.
>>> But there's no reason I can't do that too... I'll play with some
>>> style sheets.
>>
>> Cheers - so my aim would be to clear all the unnamed roads near me,
>> which somehting like I describe would be super helpful
>>
>>
>
> Not so pretty, but probably does what you want:
> http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/progress/?region=london-highlightnoname
>

have fun,

SteveC | steve at asklater.com | http://www.asklater.com/steve/