[Talk-GB] Oneway assumes cars?

[Ed Loach]

Andy wrote:

> Actually they aren't - what they are doing is making one end of
> the
> road no access to motorised vehicles. So the road itself is no
> longer
> technically oneway, so it shouldn't need cycleway=opposite...

So motorised vehicles can come in from the other end of the road,
approach the bit where they wouldn't normally be allowed to enter in
the opposite direction, then do a U-turn and leave the way they
came?

Ed