[Talk-GB] Why has City Hall sunk?

Tom Chance tom at acrewoods.net
Thu Oct 15 20:09:18 BST 2009


I understand your point but that's a very tough standard to achieve. I doubt
many mappers will bother to produce multipolygons for large public squares
with many fountains, small buildings, etc. At the very least mapnik should
treat pedestrian areas like parks.

Tom



2009/10/15 Jason Cunningham <jamicuosm at googlemail.com>

> The city hall building, the theatre area and the fountain are all mapped as
> pedestrian areas which is incorrect. We haven't mapped what's on the ground.
> I think the three non-pedestrian areas should be removed from the pedestrian
> area, or in other words the pedestrian area needs three holes created with a
> multipolygon.
>
> I don't think the mapnik renderer is at fault here.
>
> Jason
>
> 2009/10/15 Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net>
>
>> Evening,
>>
>>
>> City Hall isn't showing up on the Mapnik layer, it is tagged as
>> building=yes and amenity=townhall but only the name shows:
>>
>> http://osm.org/go/euu6AjKqZ--
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20091015/fbc4a1e2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list