[Talk-GB] Why has City Hall sunk?
tom at acrewoods.net
Thu Oct 15 20:09:18 BST 2009
I understand your point but that's a very tough standard to achieve. I doubt
many mappers will bother to produce multipolygons for large public squares
with many fountains, small buildings, etc. At the very least mapnik should
treat pedestrian areas like parks.
2009/10/15 Jason Cunningham <jamicuosm at googlemail.com>
> The city hall building, the theatre area and the fountain are all mapped as
> pedestrian areas which is incorrect. We haven't mapped what's on the ground.
> I think the three non-pedestrian areas should be removed from the pedestrian
> area, or in other words the pedestrian area needs three holes created with a
> I don't think the mapnik renderer is at fault here.
> 2009/10/15 Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net>
>> City Hall isn't showing up on the Mapnik layer, it is tagged as
>> building=yes and amenity=townhall but only the name shows:
>> Any ideas?
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-GB