[Talk-GB] XAPI lagging behind by days?
tom at acrewoods.net
Tue Mar 23 14:05:47 GMT 2010
On 23 March 2010 13:20, Christoph Boehme <christoph at b3e.net> wrote:
> Well, I just updated the Birmingham scheme two days ago to accept
> naptan:verified=yes, because Andy asked for it.
> Perhaps it makes sense to reorganise the schemes to have only one basic
> scheme which displays verification status, CUS and notes/errors and a
> number of specialised schemes building on top of the basic one for
> information that is not available everywhere like route references,
> shelter information and asset references.
That sounds sensible. The basic scheme would presumably be enough for
generalist mappers like me to be sure we're tidying NAPTAN up, without
needing all the transport geek data I've never heard of?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-GB