[Talk-GB] natural=tree

[Richard Mann]

Nop's argument was that trees have hither-to-fore been tagged only if
they were isolated, so ones that were close to one another were an
abuse of an established tag, and needed identifying as part of a
cluster.

I think the general view was that it was the notable trees that ought
to be tagged, not the other way round, but by that point Nop had done
lots of changes, and wasn't prepared to debate the matter further.
It's a mess and yes they should be reverted.

Richard

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Andrew Ainsworth
<andrew.ainsworth at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've just noticed that every tree has been edited by a bot recently, adding
> tags such as denotation=cluster and fixme=set better denotation? I'm mildly
> annoyed that this has been done as, as far I can tell, the denotation tag is
> still a proposal on the wiki and the discussion I've just read on tagging
> clearly shows that user Nop acted unilaterally with no interest in building
> a consensus with other users. The tags added add no value to the data
> what-so-ever. In my opinion, the tags on trees in my area were fine as they
> were but now have fixme on them. Is it possible to revert these edits
> (assuming other users here agree that they are worthless edits)?
> Ainsworth
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>