[Talk-GB] Stupid tags

[Dave F.]

On 18/11/2010 20:07, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> On 18/11/2010 19:36, Dave F. wrote:
>> There are too many to list, but whilst this is topical, I have a minor
>> problem with natural=*. It's far too general. I mean, everything under
>> the sun is either natural or man made.
>>
>> Also historical=* is just too subjective to be useful. Everything, by
>> definition, is historical; even this email.
> You're assuming that the actual tag text really means something.

No, I'm aware it's meaningless. I'm saying it *should* mean something.

If key tags don't mean anything, why have them?

Cheers
Dave F.