[Talk-GB] Hunt the London allotments - with wiki page

Dave F. davefox at madasafish.com
Mon Sep 27 20:22:30 BST 2010

  On 27/09/2010 19:18, Tom Chance wrote:
> On 27 September 2010 17:41, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com 
> <mailto:davefox at madasafish.com>> wrote:
>     On 27/09/2010 17:16, Tom Chance wrote:
>>     On 27 September 2010 16:34, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com
>>     <mailto:davefox at madasafish.com>> wrote:
>>         Hmm... Mapping from Yahoo without ground knowledge is
>>         legitimate. Tagging the source as Yahoo implies that it maybe
>>         out of date & another, more accurate survey, should be
>>         carried out in the future but that shouldn't hinder adding
>>         the data.
>>     I don't think the tag as used implies that,
>     All the traceable images imply a relative accuracy based when they
>     were issued.
> Yes, but how many people - upon completing a ground survey and editing 
> somebody else's objects that have already been added with a "source" 
> tag - promptly remove or amend that tag?

I've done it about half a dozen times today updating NPE to Streetview.

> How many people trace features following a survey and add the tag to 
> bits they traced from imagery, having previously confirmed that it 
> existed on the ground? It's a handy little tag, but not exactly reliable.

If it's completely from a survey then tag it 'survey' if it's a bit of 
both then - 'Yahoo;survey'

Anyhow, you made a few presumptions in your posts. Just because you 
think people don't do things a certain way doesn't mean that others 
shouldn't either. If you think it's the correct way to do something, 
then do it! - Lead by example.

Dave F.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20100927/4dad86a5/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Talk-GB mailing list