[Talk-GB] OSM Contributor Terms vs OS OpenData Licence

[TimSC]

On 19/04/11 11:45, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/19/11 12:32, TimSC wrote:
>> I still think that the CTs ask
>> for rights to be granted that are broader than are granted by the
>> Opendata license. This point is disputed by Richard and others. Here are
>> the most prolific Opendata users (in terms of version 1 objects) that
>> have accepted the CTs, along with their user IDs:
>
> Does the explicit naming of these people actually contribute anything 
> to solving the problem?
Determining the scope of the problem is perhaps the first step to 
solving it. And we might want to find out why these users felt the need 
to (possibly) violate OS Opendata's license. User education might be 
something we can work on?

However, does your question go towards solving the problem? Ad hominem 
tu quoque!

TimSC