[Talk-GB] Update to OSM Analysis
graham at dalmuti.net
Mon Feb 7 12:16:35 GMT 2011
Great work on this Peter, it's a really helpful tool.
One suggestion: perhaps on the Area Summary page you could add an
option to rank the missing roads by their approximate
length/area*, rather simply alphabetically?
Targetting the largest incorrectly named roads first seems like a
good way to focus our efforts on the largest impact. I suspect
most map users would forgive a map that doesn't name some obscure
unsigned lane that is only 20 yards long, but would be deeply
suspicious of a map that incorrectly identifies the main road
through their town.
(* I realise this is a flawed measurement, as it doesn't account
for straight vs curvy roads, but it would probably be good
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:42 +0000, "Peter Miller"
<peter.miller at itoworld.com> wrote:
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis
with a thematic overview page allowing us to see how we are
getting on in different parts of the county.
To get the top prize 95% of the roads represented in OS
Locator need to be in OSM and there are 17 districts which
achieve that today. We also have 88 districts with less that
50% coverage which need a little TLC and the rest are
Check out our announcement here and give it a whirl!
ITO World Ltd
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-GB