[Talk-GB] Yahoo! areas (was pay_scale_area)

[Andy Street]

On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 10:40 +0000, Bob Kerr wrote:
> 
> I am presently doing some tracing in Dumfries and there is a way which
> is marked public_transport=pay_scale_area. It is part of a Naptan
> import. The area seems to be vague and is cutting across a number of
> areas where I am doing some detailed work.
> 
> Is there a good reason that this should still be kept? 
> 

I've got a similar problem with ways showing the extent of hi-res Yahoo!
imagery (tagged boundary=yahoo, area=yes). I can't see any real use for
having this data in the database and if we were to do the same for other
imagery sources then it'd soon become a right old mess.

Any objections before I hit delete?

Regards,

Andy