[Talk-GB] [OSM-legal-talk] UK mapping authority switches to Open Government Licence

David Groom reviews at pacific-rim.net
Fri Jan 7 18:54:03 GMT 2011



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Collinson" <mike at ayeltd.biz>
To: "Licensing and other legal discussions." <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
Cc: <talk-gb at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] UK mapping authority switches to Open 
Government Licence


>
> At 02:47 PM 7/01/2011, David Groom wrote:
>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Collinson" <mike at ayeltd.biz>
>>>In the case of the UK OS, there is a switch from a potential requirement 
>>>for
>>>level 4 attribution to a clear requirement for level 1, so the Open
>>>Government Licence is definitely good news for handling highly granular
>>>data.
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>with regards to the OS OpenData, the bit in the licence which I am unsure 
>>about are the following lines, taken from 
>>http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/opendata/docs/os-opendata-licence.pdf
>>
>>"You must always use the following attribution statement to acknowledge 
>>the source of the Information : 'Contains Ordnance Survey data  Crown 
>>Copyright and database right 2011'"
>>
>>"The same attribution statements must be contained in any sublicenses of 
>>the information that you grant, together with a requirement that any 
>>further sub-licences do the same"
>>
>>Unfortunately the line above seems to me to extend the attribution 
>>requirements required for OpenData to a much higher attribution 
>>requirement than that required by the OGL .
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>David
>
> Thanks, David.  Bother.  Either it refers only to Royal Mail-tainted 
> Code-Point data as immediately above the text or the OS are pulling a fast 
> one by re-writing the OGL ... making it effectively their old problematic 
> license.  Assuming the latter we'll need to lobby.  UK members of this 
> list may like to help by reading through the UK government's general 
> guidelines and see if anything is clearly conflicting with what they have 
> done:

Mike

It says "attribution statements" in the plural, therefore indicating to me 
that it refers to both the OS attribution statement and the Royal Mail 
attribution statement where applicable.

Regards
David

>
> http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/government-licensing/guidance-for-information-providers.htm
>
> The best I can find so far is that the layout of the page link in David's 
> email has this extra text not anticipated in the general guideline:
>
> http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/government-licensing/how-to-make-information-available.htm
>
> "It incorporates the Open Government License for pubic sector information 
> (see below and 
> http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/) which is 
> varied by the following terms:"
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
> 







More information about the Talk-GB mailing list