cds at durhamsi.co.uk
Tue Jan 18 11:02:53 GMT 2011
I've read through the replies to your post and my take on this is
client side rendering - it's hard to make this as pretty or neat as
bitmap tiles, but for random exploration of the dataset it's
Pre-generating tiles for every concievable view of the OSM dataset is
not a very efficient way of dealing with different people wanting to
view different geographic areas in different styles.
I have an iOS app that renders vector map data on the fly, to allow
configurable rendering with selectable views (contours, waterways
etc). Streaming data to the app is a bit of a problem, so it runs
from an offline binary cache that is pre-optimised for fast rendering.
I can imagine a similar approach for OSM as a whole, where there is a
vector data server that provides data pre-optimised for configurable,
on the fly rendering. This could then be used in a variety of ways
1) Custom viewer applications, mobile or desktop - with local cacheing
of vector data this is blindingly fast
bitmap/vector renderer that annotates bitmap tiles
The key thing is to make a vector viewing tool, not a full-blown GIS
tool - so an emphasis on redraw speed and ease of use over raw power.
I have some experience and thoughts of this to add if anyone is interested.
On 17 January 2011 23:05, Chris Moss <moschris at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I'm interested in the GB waterways and it seems there's quite a bit of work
> done but it's totally invisible. Is anyone working on a layer like the cycle
> map, which leaps out from the overlays as the only minority interest yet
> It's not the only layer I'd like to see. What about walking paths, railways,
> contours, points of interest, postcode areas, administrative boundaries,
> constituencies, bus routes, etc., etc.
> Shouldn't maps allow you to concentrate on whatever you're interested in?
> Can someone please explain to me how or if this can be done with
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-GB