[Talk-GB] OpenKent, OSM coverage estimation

Richard Fairhurst richard at systemed.net
Wed Jun 8 18:11:33 BST 2011


TimSC wrote:
> Straw man.
> [...]
> Sigh.
> [...]
> It is ridiculous
> [...]
> I guess I should not surprised you can't see the benefits
> [...]
> This seems to be a common thread of your arguments - you make wild claims

Fair enough. It's fairly evident you don't see stuff on the same wavelength
as I do. I could write a thousand points in response to that lot - asking
how Mastermap's countryside coverage can possibly be "outstanding" without
footpaths, and so on - and you'd respond with a thousand other points. We
wouldn't really get anywhere. There's not really a lot of point going
through fisking the whole lot, is there? It doesn't help the other n people
reading this list.

However, it _would_ be genuinely useful to other people, in my view, if you
were to respond to my thread about "private negotiations" on legal-talk.
Hopefully you'll either be able to do so or explain why not.

Richard



--
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OpenKent-OSM-coverage-estimation-tp6434777p6454552.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



More information about the Talk-GB mailing list