[Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot
Andy Allan
gravitystorm at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 16:45:50 BST 2011
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM
<SK53_osm at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> In order to get a better level of completeness in the UK what we need are
> more mappers.
Absolutely.
Everything we do should be focussed on helping get more mappers, or
helping the mappers we have get their jobs done more easily.
Everything that is a direct substitute for having more mappers is, at
best, a distraction from (what I see as) the desired goal. If we have
mappers, and lots of them, then - as we've now demonstrated - we can
get a glorious dataset.
Note that not everyone here shares the same goals - some people are
focussed on the data, others on the community. It might be worth
examining why we (collectively) have a tendency to discuss the data
all the time and I see very few discussions on community matters.
I find in most conversations, if the answer is "because we don't have
enough mappers yet" then the solution is not to bypass them with some
form of automation but to get more of them. Unfortunately to most
OSMers, community building seems hard (which it is), and writing bots
or doing imports seems easy (which it's not).
> A bot is putting short-term gain ahead of our long-term interests.
Indeed. What's more, all the effort that goes into writing bots,
discussing them, justifying them etc is time that hasn't gone into the
primary goal of recruiting and helping more people to OSM.
Cheers,
Andy
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list