[Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot
Craig Loftus
craigloftus+osm at googlemail.com
Tue Jun 14 10:41:33 BST 2011
On 14 June 2011 10:26, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> Potlatch 2's improved (not deployed yet) shapefile background layers asks
> you for the projection before loading, rather than relying on the .prj file.
Thanks for clarifying.
I'm not very familiar with projections so a little more clarity would
be useful for me. As potlatch 'understands' OSGB, is loading an OSBG
shp file any more expensive than loading a WGS84 shp file?
If it is, it may be worthwhile reprojecting all the files. This would
also have the advantage of making the mirror useful for those of us
who simply refuse to stop using JOSM, despite all the awesome you keep
piling into potlatch.
Craig
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list